[要約] RFC 9181は、レイヤー2およびレイヤー3のVPNに共通するYANGデータモデルを定義しています。この標準は、異なるネットワーク機器間でのVPN設定の互換性と自動化を目的としています。主に、ネットワーク管理者が複数のベンダーの機器を統一的に管理する場面で利用されます。
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Barguil
Request for Comments: 9181 O. Gonzalez de Dios, Ed.
Category: Standards Track Telefonica
ISSN: 2070-1721 M. Boucadair, Ed.
Orange
Q. Wu
Huawei
February 2022
A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs
レイヤ2とレイヤ3 VPNの一般的なYANGデータモデル
Abstract
概要
This document defines a common YANG module that is meant to be reused by various VPN-related modules such as Layer 3 VPN and Layer 2 VPN network models.
この文書は、レイヤ3 VPNとレイヤ2 VPNネットワークモデルなどのさまざまなVPN関連モジュールによって再使用されることを意図した一般的なYANGモジュールを定義しています。
Status of This Memo
本文書の位置付け
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
これはインターネット規格のトラック文書です。
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
この文書はインターネットエンジニアリングタスクフォース（IETF）の製品です。IETFコミュニティのコンセンサスを表します。それはパブリックレビューを受け、インターネットエンジニアリングステアリンググループ（IESG）による出版の承認を受けました。インターネット規格に関する詳細情報は、RFC 7841のセクション2で利用できます。
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9181.
この文書の現在のステータス、任意のエラータ、およびフィードバックを提供する方法は、https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9181で取得できます。
Copyright Notice
著作権表示
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
著作権（c）2022 IETF信頼と文書の著者として識別された人。全著作権所有。
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
この文書は、この文書の公開日に有効なIETF文書（https://trustee.ietf.org/License-Info）に関するBCP 78およびIETF信頼の法的規定の対象となります。この文書に関してあなたの権利と制限を説明するので、これらの文書をよくレビューしてください。この文書から抽出されたコードコンポーネントには、信託法定規定のセクション4。
Table of Contents
目次
1. Introduction
2. Terminology
3. Description of the VPN Common YANG Module
4. Layer 2/3 VPN Common Module
5. Security Considerations
6. IANA Considerations
7. References
7.1. Normative References
7.2. Informative References
Appendix A. Example of Common Data Nodes in Early L2NM/L3NM
Designs
Acknowledgements
Contributors
Authors' Addresses
The IETF has specified YANG modules for VPN services, e.g., the Layer 3 VPN Service Model (L3SM) [RFC8299] or the Layer 2 VPN Service Model (L2SM) [RFC8466]. Other relevant YANG data models are the Layer 3 VPN Network Model (L3NM) [RFC9182] and the Layer 2 VPN Network Model (L2NM) [L2NM-YANG]. There are common data nodes and structures that are present in all of these models or at least a subset of them.
IETFは、VPNサービス、例えばレイヤ3 VPNサービスモデル（L3SM）[RFC8299]またはレイヤ2 VPNサービスモデル（L2SM）[RFC8466]のYANGモジュールを指定しています。その他の関連YANGデータモデルは、レイヤ3 VPNネットワークモデル（L3NM）[RFC9182]とレイヤ2 VPNネットワークモデル（L2NM）[L2NM-YANG]です。これらのモデルのすべてまたはそれらの少なくともサブセットに存在する一般的なデータノードと構造体があります。
This document defines a common YANG module that is meant to be reused by various VPN-related modules such as the L3NM [RFC9182] and the L2NM [L2NM-YANG]: "ietf-vpn-common" (Section 4).
この文書は、L3NM [RFC9182]やL2NM [L2NM-YANG]など、さまざまなVPN関連モジュールによって再利用されることを目的とした一般的なYANGモジュールを定義しています（セクション4）。
The "ietf-vpn-common" module includes a set of identities, types, and groupings that are meant to be reused by other VPN-related YANG modules independently of their layer (e.g., Layer 2, Layer 3) and the type of the module (e.g., network model, service model), including possible future revisions of existing models (e.g., the L3SM [RFC8299] or the L2SM [RFC8466]).
「IETF - VPN - Common」モジュールは、それらの層（例えば、レイヤ2、レイヤ3）およびの種類とは無関係に他のVPN関連YANモジュールによって再使用されることを意図した一連の識別、タイプ、およびグループ化を含む。既存のモデルの将来のリビジョンを含むモジュール（例えば、ネットワークモデル、サービスモデル）（例えば、L3SM [RFC8299]またはL2SM [RFC8466]）。
The terminology for describing YANG modules is defined in [RFC7950].
Yangモジュールを記述するための用語は[RFC7950]で定義されています。
The meanings of the symbols in tree diagrams are defined in [RFC8340].
ツリー図のシンボルの意味は[RFC8340]で定義されています。
The reader may refer to [RFC4026] and [RFC4176] for VPN-related terms.
リーダーは、VPN関連の用語の[RFC4026]と[RFC4176]を参照することがあります。
This document inherits many terms from [RFC8299] and [RFC8466] (e.g., Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB), Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications (URLLC), Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC)).
この文書は、[RFC8299]と[RFC8466]（例えば、強化されたモバイルブロードバンド（EMBB）、超信頼性および低遅延通信（URLLC）、大型の機械式通信（MMTC））から多くの用語を継承しています。
The "ietf-vpn-common" module defines a set of common VPN-related features, including the following:
「IETF-VPN-Common」モジュールは、次のような一般的なVPN関連機能のセットを定義します。
Encapsulation features, such as the following: * dot1Q [IEEE802.1Q],
次のようなカプセル化機能：* dot1q [ieee802.1q]、
* QinQ [IEEE802.1ad],
* QinQ [IEEE802.1AD]、
* link aggregation [IEEE802.1AX], and
* リンクアグリゲーション[IEEE802.1ax]、および
* Virtual eXtensible Local Area Networks (VXLANs) [RFC7348].
* 仮想拡張ローカルエリアネットワーク（VXLANS）[RFC7348]。
Multicast [RFC6513].
マルチキャスト[RFC6513]。
Routing features, such as the following: * BGP [RFC4271],
次のようなルーティング機能：* BGP [RFC4271]、
* OSPF [RFC4577] [RFC6565],
* OSPF [RFC4577] [RFC6565]
* IS-IS [ISO10589],
* is-is [ISO10589]
* RIP [RFC2080] [RFC2453],
* RIP [RFC 2080] [RFC 2453]、
* Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880] [RFC7880], and
* 双方向転送検出（BFD）[RFC5880] [RFC7880]、および
* Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) [RFC5798].
* 仮想ルータ冗長プロトコル（VRRP）[RFC5798]。
Also, the module defines a set of identities, including the following:
また、このモジュールは、次のようなIDのセットを定義します。
'service-type': Used to identify the VPN service type. Examples of supported service types are as follows:
'service-type'：VPNサービスタイプを識別するために使用されます。サポートされているサービスタイプの例は次のとおりです。
* L3VPN,
* L3VPN、
* Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) using BGP [RFC4761],
* BGPを用いた仮想プライベートLANサービス（VPLS）[RFC4761]、
* VPLS using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) [RFC4762],
* ラベル配布プロトコル（LDP）を使用したVPLS [RFC4762]、
* Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS) [RFC8214],
* 仮想プライベートワイヤサービス（VPWS）[RFC8214]、
* BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN [RFC7432],
* BGP MPLSベースイーサネットVPN [RFC7432]、
* Ethernet VPN (EVPN) [RFC8365], and
* イーサネットVPN（EVPN）[RFC8365]
* Provider Backbone Bridging Combined with Ethernet VPN (PBB-EVPN) [RFC7623].
* イーサネットVPN（PBB-EVPN）[RFC7623]と組み合わせたプロバイダバックボーンブリッジング。
'vpn-signaling-type': Used to identify the signaling mode used for a given service type. Examples of supported VPN signaling types are as follows:
'vpn-signaling-type'：特定のサービスタイプに使用されるシグナリングモードを識別するために使用されます。サポートされているVPNシグナリングタイプの例は次のとおりです。
* L2VPNs using BGP [RFC6624],
* BGPを使用したL2VPNS [RFC6624]、
* LDP [RFC5036], and
* LDP [RFC5036]、および
* Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) [RFC3931].
* レイヤ2トンネリングプロトコル（L2TP）[RFC3931]。
The module covers both IPv4 [RFC0791] and IPv6 [RFC8200] identities. It also includes multicast-related identities such as Internet Group Management Protocol version 1 (IGMPv1) [RFC1112], IGMPv2 [RFC2236], IGMPv3 [RFC3376], Multicast Listener Discovery version 1 (MLDv1) [RFC2710], MLDv2 [RFC3810], and Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) [RFC7761].
このモジュールは、IPv4 [RFC0791]とIPv6 [RFC8200] IDの両方をカバーしています。インターネットグループ管理プロトコルバージョン1（IGMPv1）[RFC1112]、IGMPv2 [RFC2236]、Multicast Listener Discoveryバージョン1（MLDV1）[RFC2710]、MLDV2 [RFC3810]、MLDV2 [RFC3810]などのマルチキャスト関連のアイデンティティも含まれています。プロトコル独立マルチキャスト（PIM）[RFC7761]。
The reader should refer to Section 4 for the full list of supported identities (identities related to address families, VPN topologies, network access types, operational and administrative status, site or node role, VPN service constraints, routing protocols, route import and export policies, bandwidth, Quality of Service (QoS), etc.).
読者はサポートされているIDの全リストについてセクション4を参照する必要があります（アドレスファミリ、VPNトポロジ、ネットワークアクセスタイプ、運用上および管理ステータス、サイトまたはノーズの役割、VPNサービス制約、ルーティングプロトコル、ルートインポートおよびエクスポートポリシー）、帯域幅、サービス品質（QoS）など）。
The "ietf-vpn-common" module also contains a set of reusable VPN-related groupings. Figure 1 provides the tree diagram that depicts the common groupings for the "ietf-vpn-common" module.
"IETF-vpn-common"モジュールには、再利用可能なVPN関連のグループのセットも含まれています。図1は、「IETF-VPN共通」モジュールの一般的なグループを表すツリー図を示しています。
module: ietf-vpn-common
grouping vpn-description:
+-- vpn-id? vpn-id
+-- vpn-name? string
+-- vpn-description? string
+-- customer-name? string
grouping vpn-profile-cfg:
+-- valid-provider-identifiers
+-- external-connectivity-identifier* [id]
| {external-connectivity}?
| +-- id string
+-- encryption-profile-identifier* [id]
| +-- id string
+-- qos-profile-identifier* [id]
| +-- id string
+-- bfd-profile-identifier* [id]
| +-- id string
+-- forwarding-profile-identifier* [id]
| +-- id string
+-- routing-profile-identifier* [id]
+-- id string
grouping oper-status-timestamp:
+--ro status? identityref
+--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
grouping service-status:
+-- status
+-- admin-status
| +-- status? identityref
| +-- last-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro oper-status
+--ro status? identityref
+--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
grouping underlay-transport:
+-- (type)?
+--:(abstract)
| +-- transport-instance-id? string
| +-- instance-type? identityref
+--:(protocol)
+-- protocol* identityref
grouping vpn-route-targets:
+-- vpn-target* [id]
| +-- id uint8
| +-- route-targets* [route-target]
| | +-- route-target rt-types:route-target
| +-- route-target-type rt-types:route-target-type
+-- vpn-policies
+-- import-policy? string
+-- export-policy? string
grouping route-distinguisher:
...
grouping vpn-components-group:
+-- groups
+-- group* [group-id]
+-- group-id string
grouping placement-constraints:
+-- constraint* [constraint-type]
+-- constraint-type? identityref
+-- target
+-- (target-flavor)?
+--:(id)
| +-- group* [group-id]
| +-- group-id string
+--:(all-accesses)
| +-- all-other-accesses? empty
+--:(all-groups)
+-- all-other-groups? empty
grouping ports:
...
grouping qos-classification-policy:
...
Figure 1: VPN Common Tree
図1：VPN共通ツリー
The descriptions of the common groupings are provided below:
一般的なグループの説明は以下のとおりです。
'vpn-description': A YANG grouping that provides common administrative VPN information such as an identifier, a name, a textual description, and a customer name.
'vpn-description'：識別子、名前、テキスト記述、および顧客名などの一般的な管理VPN情報を提供するYANGグループ化。
'vpn-profile-cfg': A YANG grouping that defines a set of valid profiles (encryption, routing, forwarding, etc.) that can be bound to a Layer 2/3 VPN. This document does not make any assumptions about the structure of such profiles but allows "gluing" a VPN service with other parameters that can be required locally to provide value-added features to requesting customers.
'vpn-profile-cfg'：レイヤ2/3 VPNにバインドできる有効なプロファイルのセット（暗号化、ルーティング、転送など）を定義するYANDグループ化。この文書はそのようなプロファイルの構造についての仮定をしませんが、顧客を要求するためにバリューに追加された機能を提供するためにローカルに要求される可能性がある他のパラメータとのVPNサービスを「接着」することを可能にします。
For example, a service provider may provide external connectivity to a VPN customer (e.g., to a private or public cloud, Internet). Such a service may involve tweaking both filtering and NAT rules (e.g., binding a Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) interface with a NAT instance as discussed in Section 2.10 of [RFC8512]). These value-added features may be bound to all, or a subset of, network accesses. Some of these value-added features may be implemented in nodes other than Provider Edges (PEs) (e.g., a P node or even a dedicated node that hosts the NAT function).
例えば、サービスプロバイダは、VPN顧客（例えば、プライベートまたはパブリッククラウド、インターネットに）に外部接続を提供することができる。そのようなサービスは、[RFC8512]のセクション2.10で説明されているように、フィルタリングおよびNATルールの両方を微調整することを含み得る（例えば、2.10節）。これらの付加価値機能は、ネットワークアクセスのすべて、またはサブセットにバインドされてもよい。これらの付加価値機能のいくつかは、プロバイダエッジ（PES）以外のノード（例えば、PノードまたはNAT機能をホストする専用ノード）に実装されてもよい。
Elaborating on the structure of these profiles is beyond the scope of this document.
これらのプロファイルの構造を詳しく説明することはこの文書の範囲を超えています。
'oper-status-timestamp': A YANG grouping that defines the operational status updates of a VPN service or component.
'oper-status-timestamp'：VPNサービスまたはコンポーネントの運用ステータスの更新を定義するYANGグループ化。
'service-status': A YANG grouping that defines the administrative and operational status of a component. The grouping can be applied to the whole service or an endpoint.
'service-status'：コンポーネントの管理ステータスと運用ステータスを定義するYANGグループ化。グループ化は、サービス全体またはエンドポイントに適用できます。
'underlay-transport': A YANG grouping that defines the type of the underlay transport for a VPN service or how that underlay is set.
'underlay-transport'：VPNサービスのアンダーレイトランスポートの種類またはその下方が設定されている方法を定義するYANGグループ化。
The underlay transport can be expressed as an abstract transport
instance (e.g., an identifier of a VPN+ instance
[Enhanced-VPN-Framework], a virtual network identifier
[ACTN-VN-YANG] [RFC8453], or a network slice name
[Network-Slices-Framework]) or as an ordered list of the actual
protocols to be enabled in the network.
The module supports a rich set of protocol identifiers that can be used, for example, to refer to an underlay transport. Examples of supported protocols are as follows:
このモジュールは、例えばアンダーレイトランスポートを指すために使用できるプロトコル識別子のリッチセットをサポートします。サポートされているプロトコルの例は次のとおりです。
* IP in IP [RFC2003] [RFC2473],
* IPのIP [RFC2003] [RFC2473]
* Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) [RFC1701] [RFC1702] [RFC7676],
* 一般的なルーティングカプセル化（GRE）[RFC1701] [RFC1702] [RFC7676]
* MPLS in UDP [RFC7510],
* UDPのMPLS [RFC7510]、
* Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve) [RFC8926],
* 一般的なネットワーク仮想化カプセル化（Geneeve）[RFC8926]、
* Segment Routing (SR) [RFC8660] [RFC8663] [RFC8754],
* セグメントルーティング（SR）[RFC8660] [RFC8663] [RFC8754]、
* Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) with traffic engineering extensions [RFC3209], and
* トラフィックエンジニアリング拡張[RFC3209]を備えたリソース予約プロトコル（RSVP）
* BGP with labeled prefixes [RFC8277].
* ラベル付きプレフィックス付きBGP [RFC8277]。
'vpn-route-targets': A YANG grouping that defines Route Target (RT) import/export rules used in a BGP-enabled VPN. This grouping can be used for both L3VPNs [RFC4364] and L2VPNs [RFC4664]. Note that this is modeled as a list to ease the reuse of this grouping in modules where an RT identifier is needed (e.g., associating an operator with RTs).
'vpn-route-targets'：BGP対応のVPNで使用されるルートターゲット（RT）インポート/エクスポートルールを定義するYANGグループ化。このグループ化は、L3VPNS [RFC4364]とL2VPNS [RFC4664]の両方に使用できます。これは、RT識別子が必要なモジュール内のこのグループ化の再利用を容易にするためのリストとしてモデル化されている（例えば、オペレータとRTSと関連付ける）。
'route-distinguisher': A YANG grouping that defines Route Distinguishers (RDs).
'route-distinguisher'：ルート識別子（RDS）を定義するYANGグループ化。
As depicted in Figure 2, the module supports the following RD assignment modes: direct assignment, full automatic assignment, automatic assignment from a given pool, and no assignment.
図2に示すように、このモジュールは次のRD割り当てモードをサポートします。直接割り当て、フルオートマチック割り当て、特定のプールからの自動割り当て、および割り当てなし。
Also, the module accommodates deployments where only the Assigned Number subfield of RDs (Section 4.2 of [RFC4364]) is assigned from a pool while the Administrator subfield is set to, for example, the Router ID that is assigned to a VPN node. The module supports three modes for managing the Assigned Number subfield: explicit assignment, automatic assignment from a given pool, and full automatic assignment.
また、このモジュールは、管理者サブフィールドがVPNノードに割り当てられているルータIDなどのルータIDに設定されている間に、RDSの割り当てられた番号サブフィールド（RFC4364]のセクション4.2）のみがプールから割り当てられている展開を収容します。このモジュールは、割り当てられた番号サブフィールド：明示的な割り当て、特定のプールからの自動割り当て、およびフルオートマチック割り当てを管理するための3つのモードをサポートします。
grouping route-distinguisher:
+-- (rd-choice)?
+--:(directly-assigned)
| +-- rd? rt-types:route-distinguisher
+--:(directly-assigned-suffix)
| +-- rd-suffix? uint16
+--:(auto-assigned)
| +-- rd-auto
| +-- (auto-mode)?
| | +--:(from-pool)
| | | +-- rd-pool-name? string
| | +--:(full-auto)
| | +-- auto? empty
| +--ro auto-assigned-rd?
| | rt-types:route-distinguisher
+--:(auto-assigned-suffix)
| +-- rd-auto-suffix
| +-- (auto-mode)?
| | +--:(from-pool)
| | | +-- rd-pool-name? string
| | +--:(full-auto)
| | +-- auto? empty
| +--ro auto-assigned-rd-suffix? uint16
+--:(no-rd)
+-- no-rd? empty
Figure 2: Route Distinguisher Grouping Subtree
図2：ルート識別詐欺グループ化サブツリー
'vpn-components-group': A YANG grouping that is used to group VPN nodes, VPN network accesses, or sites. For example, diversity or redundancy constraints can be applied on a per-group basis.
'vpn-components-group'：VPNノード、VPNネットワークアクセス、またはサイトをグループ化するために使用されるYANDグループ化。たとえば、多様性または冗長制約をグループごとに適用できます。
'placement-constraints': A YANG grouping that is used to define the placement constraints of a VPN node, VPN network access, or site.
'Placement-Constraints'：VPNノード、VPNネットワークアクセス、またはサイトの配置制約を定義するために使用されるYANGグループ化。
'ports': A YANG grouping that defines ranges of source and destination port numbers and operators. The subtree of this grouping is depicted in Figure 3.
'ports'：ソースと宛先のポート番号と演算子の範囲を定義するYANGグループ化。このグループ化のサブツリーは図3に示されています。
grouping ports:
+-- (source-port)?
| +--:(source-port-range-or-operator)
| +-- source-port-range-or-operator
| +-- (port-range-or-operator)?
| +--:(range)
| | +-- lower-port inet:port-number
| | +-- upper-port inet:port-number
| +--:(operator)
| +-- operator? operator
| +-- port inet:port-number
+-- (destination-port)?
+--:(destination-port-range-or-operator)
+-- destination-port-range-or-operator
+-- (port-range-or-operator)?
+--:(range)
| +-- lower-port inet:port-number
| +-- upper-port inet:port-number
+--:(operator)
+-- operator? operator
+-- port inet:port-number
Figure 3: Port Numbers Grouping Subtree
図3：ポート番号のグループ化サブツリー
'qos-classification-policy': A YANG grouping that defines a set of QoS classification policies based on various Layer 3/4 and application match criteria. The subtree of this grouping is depicted in Figure 4.
'qos-classification-policy'：さまざまなレイヤ3/4とアプリケーション一致基準に基づいて一連のQoS分類ポリシーを定義するYANGグループ化。このグループ化のサブツリーは図4に示されています。
The QoS match criteria reuse groupings that are defined in the packet fields module "ietf-packet-fields" (Section 4.2 of [RFC8519]).
QoS Match Criteriaは、パケットフィールドモジュール "IETF-Packet-Fields"（[RFC8519]のセクション4.2）で定義されているグループ化を再利用します。
Any Layer 4 protocol can be indicated in the 'protocol' data node under 'l3', but only TCP- and UDP-specific match criteria are elaborated on in this version, as these protocols are widely used in the context of VPN services. Future revisions can be considered to add other Layer-4-specific parameters (e.g., the Stream Control Transmission Protocol [RFC4960]), if needed.
任意のレイヤ4プロトコルは、 'L3'の下の 'プロトコル'データノードに示されていますが、これらのプロトコルはVPNサービスのコンテキストで広く使用されているため、このバージョンではTCP-およびUDP固有の一致基準のみが詳しく説明されています。必要ならば、将来の改訂は他のレイヤ4固有のパラメータ（例えば、ストリーム制御伝送プロトコル[RFC4960]）を追加すると考えることができます。
Some transport protocols use existing protocols (e.g., TCP or UDP) as the substrate. The match criteria for such protocols may rely upon the 'protocol' under 'l3', TCP/UDP match criteria as shown in Figure 4, part of the TCP/UDP payload, or a combination thereof. This version of the module does not support such advanced match criteria. Future revisions of the module may consider adding match criteria based on the transport protocol payload (e.g., by means of a bitmask match).
一部のトランスポートプロトコルは、基板として既存のプロトコル（例えば、TCPまたはUDP）を使用する。そのようなプロトコルの一致基準は、図4に示すように、「L3」の下の「プロトコル」、TCP / UDPペイロードの一部、またはそれらの組み合わせに頼ることができる。このバージョンのモジュールは、そのような高度な一致基準をサポートしていません。モジュールの将来のリビジョンは、トランスポートプロトコルペイロードに基づいて一致基準を追加することを検討してもよい（例えば、ビットマスク一致によって）。
grouping qos-classification-policy:
+-- rule* [id]
+-- id string
+-- (match-type)?
| +--:(match-flow)
| | +-- (l3)?
| | | +--:(ipv4)
| | | | +-- ipv4
| | | | +-- dscp? inet:dscp
| | | | +-- ecn? uint8
| | | | +-- length? uint16
| | | | +-- ttl? uint8
| | | | +-- protocol? uint8
| | | | +-- ihl? uint8
| | | | +-- flags? bits
| | | | +-- offset? uint16
| | | | +-- identification? uint16
| | | | +-- (destination-network)?
| | | | | +--:(destination-ipv4-network)
| | | | | +-- destination-ipv4-network?
| | | | | inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | | +-- (source-network)?
| | | | +--:(source-ipv4-network)
| | | | +-- source-ipv4-network?
| | | | inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | +--:(ipv6)
| | | +-- ipv6
| | | +-- dscp? inet:dscp
| | | +-- ecn? uint8
| | | +-- length? uint16
| | | +-- ttl? uint8
| | | +-- protocol? uint8
| | | +-- (destination-network)?
| | | | +--:(destination-ipv6-network)
| | | | +-- destination-ipv6-network?
| | | | inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | +-- (source-network)?
| | | | +--:(source-ipv6-network)
| | | | +-- source-ipv6-network?
| | | | inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | +-- flow-label?
| | | inet:ipv6-flow-label
| | +-- (l4)?
| | +--:(tcp)
| | | +-- tcp
| | | +-- sequence-number? uint32
| | | +-- acknowledgement-number? uint32
| | | +-- data-offset? uint8
| | | +-- reserved? uint8
| | | +-- flags? bits
| | | +-- window-size? uint16
| | | +-- urgent-pointer? uint16
| | | +-- options? binary
| | | +-- (source-port)?
| | | | +--:(source-port-range-or-operator)
| | | | +-- source-port-range-or-operator
| | | | +-- (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | | +--:(range)
| | | | | +-- lower-port
| | | | | | inet:port-number
| | | | | +-- upper-port
| | | | | inet:port-number
| | | | +--:(operator)
| | | | +-- operator? operator
| | | | +-- port
| | | | inet:port-number
| | | +-- (destination-port)?
| | | +--:(destination-port-range-or-operator)
| | | +-- destination-port-range-or-operator
| | | +-- (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | +--:(range)
| | | | +-- lower-port
| | | | | inet:port-number
| | | | +-- upper-port
| | | | inet:port-number
| | | +--:(operator)
| | | +-- operator? operator
| | | +-- port
| | | inet:port-number
| | +--:(udp)
| | +-- udp
| | +-- length? uint16
| | +-- (source-port)?
| | | +--:(source-port-range-or-operator)
| | | +-- source-port-range-or-operator
| | | +-- (port-range-or-operator)?
| | | +--:(range)
| | | | +-- lower-port
| | | | | inet:port-number
| | | | +-- upper-port
| | | | inet:port-number
| | | +--:(operator)
| | | +-- operator? operator
| | | +-- port
| | | inet:port-number
| | +-- (destination-port)?
| | +--:(destination-port-range-or-operator)
| | +-- destination-port-range-or-operator
| | +-- (port-range-or-operator)?
| | +--:(range)
| | | +-- lower-port
| | | | inet:port-number
| | | +-- upper-port
| | | inet:port-number
| | +--:(operator)
| | +-- operator? operator
| | +-- port
| | inet:port-number
| +--:(match-application)
| +-- match-application? identityref
+-- target-class-id? string
Figure 4: QoS Classification Subtree
図4：QoS分類サブツリー
This module uses types defined in [RFC6991], [RFC8294], and [RFC8519]. It also uses the extension defined in [RFC8341].
このモジュールは[RFC6991]、[RFC8294]、[RFC8519]で定義されている型を使用しています。[RFC8341]で定義されている拡張子も使用します。
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-vpn-common@2022-02-11.yang"
module ietf-vpn-common {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vpn-common";
prefix vpn-common;
import ietf-netconf-acm {
prefix nacm;
reference
"RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix rt-types;
reference
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types, Section 3";
}
import ietf-packet-fields {
prefix packet-fields;
reference
"RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access
Control Lists (ACLs)";
}
organization
"IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/>
WG List: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Author: Samier Barguil <mailto:samier.barguilgiraldo.ext@telefonica.com> Editor: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com> Author: Qin Wu <mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>"; description "This YANG module defines a common module that is meant to be reused by various VPN-related modules (e.g., the Layer 3 VPN Service Model (L3SM), the Layer 2 VPN Service Model (L2SM), the Layer 3 VPN Network Model (L3NM), and the Layer 2 VPN Network Model (L2NM)).
編集者：Mohamed Boucadair <mailto：mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>著者：Samier Barguil <mailto：samier.barguilgiraldo.ext@telefonica.com>編集：OSCAR Gonzalez de dios <mailto：oscar.gonzalezdios@telefonica.com>著者>：Qin Wu <Mailto：bill.wu@huawei.com> "; description"このYangモジュールは、さまざまなVPN関連モジュール（Layer 3 VPNサービスモデル（L3SM））によって再利用されることを意図した共通モジュールを定義します。レイヤ2 VPNサービスモデル（L2SM）、レイヤ3 VPNネットワークモデル（L3nm）、およびレイヤ2 VPNネットワークモデル（L2nm））。
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Copyright（C）2022 IETF信頼とコードの著者として識別された人。全著作権所有。
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
修正の有無にかかわらず、ソースおよびバイナリ形式での再配布と使用は、IETF信託の法定条項の第4章に記載されている改訂されたBSDライセンスに準拠しており、これに含まれるライセンス条項に従って許可されています。https://trustee.ietf.org/License-info）。
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 9181; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
このYangモジュールのこのバージョンはRFC 9181の一部です。完全な法的通知のためのRFC自体を参照してください。」
revision 2022-02-11 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3
VPNs";
}
/******** Collection of VPN-related features ********/
/*
* Features related to encapsulation schemes
*/
feature dot1q {
description
"Indicates support for dot1Q encapsulation.";
reference
"IEEE Std 802.1Q: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan
Area Networks--Bridges and Bridged
Networks";
}
feature qinq {
description
"Indicates support for QinQ encapsulation.";
reference
"IEEE Std 802.1ad: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan
Area Networks---Virtual Bridged Local
Area Networks---Amendment 4: Provider
Bridges";
}
feature vxlan {
description
"Indicates support for Virtual eXtensible Local Area
Network (VXLAN) encapsulation.";
reference
"RFC 7348: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN):
A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2
Networks over Layer 3 Networks";
}
feature qinany {
description
"Indicates support for QinAny encapsulation.
The outer VLAN tag is set to a specific value, but
the inner VLAN tag is set to any.";
}
feature lag-interface {
description
"Indicates support for Link Aggregation Groups (LAGs)
between VPN network accesses.";
reference
"IEEE Std 802.1AX: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan
Area Networks--Link Aggregation";
}
/*
* Features related to multicast
*/
feature multicast {
description
"Indicates support for multicast capabilities in a VPN.";
reference
"RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs";
}
feature igmp {
description
"Indicates support for the Internet Group Management
Protocol (IGMP).";
reference
"RFC 1112: Host Extensions for IP Multicasting
RFC 2236: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2
RFC 3376: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3";
}
feature mld {
description
"Indicates support for Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD).";
reference
"RFC 2710: Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6
RFC 3810: Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2)
for IPv6";
}
feature pim {
description
"Indicates support for Protocol Independent Multicast
(PIM).";
reference
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)";
}
/*
* Features related to address family types
*/
feature ipv4 {
description
"Indicates IPv4 support in a VPN. That is, IPv4 traffic
can be carried in the VPN, IPv4 addresses/prefixes can
be assigned to a VPN network access, IPv4 routes can be
installed for the Customer Edge to Provider Edge (CE-PE)
link, etc.";
reference
"RFC 791: Internet Protocol";
}
feature ipv6 {
description
"Indicates IPv6 support in a VPN. That is, IPv6 traffic
can be carried in the VPN, IPv6 addresses/prefixes can
be assigned to a VPN network access, IPv6 routes can be
installed for the CE-PE link, etc.";
reference
"RFC 8200: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification";
}
/*
* Features related to routing protocols
*/
feature rtg-ospf {
description
"Indicates support for OSPF as the Provider Edge to
Customer Edge (PE-CE) routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol
for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge
(PE-CE) Routing Protocol";
}
feature rtg-ospf-sham-link {
description
"Indicates support for OSPF sham links.";
reference
"RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol
for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs),
Section 4.2.7
RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge
(PE-CE) Routing Protocol, Section 5";
}
feature rtg-bgp {
description
"Indicates support for BGP as the PE-CE routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
}
feature rtg-rip {
description
"Indicates support for RIP as the PE-CE routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 2453: RIP Version 2
RFC 2080: RIPng for IPv6";
}
feature rtg-isis {
description
"Indicates support for IS-IS as the PE-CE routing
protocol.";
reference
"ISO10589: Information technology - Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems -
Intermediate System to Intermediate System
intra-domain routeing information exchange
protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol
for providing the connectionless-mode network
service (ISO 8473)";
}
feature rtg-vrrp {
description
"Indicates support for the Virtual Router Redundancy
Protocol (VRRP) in the CE-PE link.";
reference
"RFC 5798: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6";
}
feature bfd {
description
"Indicates support for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) between the CE and the PE.";
reference
"RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)";
}
/*
* Features related to VPN service constraints
*/
feature bearer-reference {
description
"A bearer refers to properties of the CE-PE attachment that
are below Layer 3.
This feature indicates support for the bearer reference
access constraint, i.e., the reuse of a network connection
that was already ordered to the service provider apart from
the IP VPN site.";
}
feature placement-diversity {
description
"Indicates support for placement diversity constraints in
the customer premises. An example of these constraints
may be to avoid connecting a site network access to the
same PE as a target site network access.";
}
/*
* Features related to bandwidth and Quality of Service (QoS)
*/
feature qos {
description
"Indicates support for Classes of Service (CoSes) in
the VPN.";
}
feature inbound-bw {
description
"Indicates support for the inbound bandwidth in a VPN,
i.e., support for specifying the download bandwidth from
the service provider network to the VPN site. Note that
the L3SM uses 'input' to identify the same feature.
That terminology should be deprecated in favor of
the terminology defined in this module.";
}
feature outbound-bw {
description
"Indicates support for the outbound bandwidth in a VPN,
i.e., support for specifying the upload bandwidth from
the VPN site to the service provider network. Note that
the L3SM uses 'output' to identify the same feature.
That terminology should be deprecated in favor of the
terminology defined in this module.";
}
/*
* Features related to security and resilience
*/
feature encryption {
description
"Indicates support for encryption in the VPN.";
}
feature fast-reroute {
description
"Indicates support for Fast Reroute (FRR) capabilities for
a VPN site.";
}
/*
* Features related to advanced VPN options
*/
feature external-connectivity {
description
"Indicates support for the VPN to provide external
connectivity (e.g., Internet, private or public cloud).";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 11";
}
feature extranet-vpn {
description
"Indicates support for extranet VPNs, i.e., the capability
of a VPN to access a list of other VPNs.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 1.1";
}
feature carriers-carrier {
description
"Indicates support for Carriers' Carriers in VPNs.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 9";
}
/*
* Identities related to address families
*/
identity address-family {
description
"Defines a type for the address family.";
}
identity ipv4 {
base address-family;
description
"Identity for an IPv4 address family.";
}
identity ipv6 {
base address-family;
description
"Identity for an IPv6 address family.";
}
identity dual-stack {
base address-family;
description
"Identity for IPv4 and IPv6 address families.";
}
/*
* Identities related to VPN topology
*/
identity vpn-topology {
description
"Base identity of the VPN topology.";
}
identity any-to-any {
base vpn-topology;
description
"Identity for any-to-any VPN topology. All VPN sites
can communicate with each other without any restrictions.";
}
identity hub-spoke {
base vpn-topology;
description
"Identity for Hub-and-Spoke VPN topology. All Spokes can
communicate with Hubs only and not with each other. Hubs
can communicate with each other.";
}
identity hub-spoke-disjoint {
base vpn-topology;
description
"Identity for Hub-and-Spoke VPN topology where Hubs cannot
communicate with each other.";
}
identity custom {
base vpn-topology;
description
"Identity for custom VPN topologies where the role of the
nodes is not strictly Hub or Spoke. The VPN topology is
controlled by the import/export policies. The custom
topology reflects more complex VPN nodes, such as a
VPN node that acts as a Hub for certain nodes and a Spoke
for others.";
}
/*
* Identities related to network access types
*/
identity site-network-access-type {
description
"Base identity for site network access types.";
}
identity point-to-point {
base site-network-access-type;
description
"Point-to-point access type.";
}
identity multipoint {
base site-network-access-type;
description
"Multipoint access type.";
}
identity irb {
base site-network-access-type;
description
"Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB).
Identity for pseudowire connections.";
}
identity loopback {
base site-network-access-type;
description
"Loopback access type.";
}
/*
* Identities related to operational and administrative status
*/
identity operational-status {
description
"Base identity for operational status.";
}
identity op-up {
base operational-status;
description
"Operational status is Up/Enabled.";
}
identity op-down {
base operational-status;
description
"Operational status is Down/Disabled.";
}
identity op-unknown {
base operational-status;
description
"Operational status is Unknown.";
}
identity administrative-status {
description
"Base identity for administrative status.";
}
identity admin-up {
base administrative-status;
description
"Administrative status is Up/Enabled.";
}
identity admin-down {
base administrative-status;
description
"Administrative status is Down/Disabled.";
}
identity admin-testing {
base administrative-status;
description
"Administrative status is Up for testing purposes.";
}
identity admin-pre-deployment {
base administrative-status;
description
"Administrative status reflects a pre-deployment phase,
i.e., prior to the actual deployment of a service.";
}
/*
* Identities related to site or node roles
*/
identity role {
description
"Base identity of a site or node role.";
}
identity any-to-any-role {
base role;
description
"Any-to-any role.";
}
identity spoke-role {
base role;
description
"A node or a site is acting as a Spoke.";
}
identity hub-role {
base role;
description
"A node or a site is acting as a Hub.";
}
identity custom-role {
base role;
description
"VPN node with a custom or complex role in the VPN. For
some sources/destinations, it can behave as a Hub, but for
others, it can act as a Spoke, depending on the configured
policy.";
}
/*
* Identities related to VPN service constraints
*/
identity placement-diversity {
description
"Base identity for access placement constraints.";
}
identity bearer-diverse {
base placement-diversity;
description
"Bearer diversity.
The bearers should not use common elements.";
}
identity pe-diverse {
base placement-diversity;
description
"PE diversity.";
}
identity pop-diverse {
base placement-diversity;
description
"Point of Presence (POP) diversity.";
}
identity linecard-diverse {
base placement-diversity;
description
"Linecard diversity.";
}
identity same-pe {
base placement-diversity;
description
"Having sites connected on the same PE.";
}
identity same-bearer {
base placement-diversity;
description
"Having sites connected using the same bearer.";
}
/*
* Identities related to service types
*/
identity service-type {
description
"Base identity for service types.";
}
identity l3vpn {
base service-type;
description
"L3VPN service.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)";
}
identity vpls {
base service-type;
description
"Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS).";
reference
"RFC 4761: Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for
Auto-Discovery and Signaling
RFC 4762: Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using Label
Distribution Protocol (LDP) Signaling";
}
identity vpws {
base service-type;
description
"Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS).";
reference
"RFC 4664: Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
(L2VPNs), Section 3.1.1";
}
identity vpws-evpn {
base service-type;
description
"Ethernet VPN (EVPN) used to support VPWS.";
reference
"RFC 8214: Virtual Private Wire Service Support in
Ethernet VPN";
}
identity pbb-evpn {
base service-type;
description
"Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB) EVPN service.";
reference
"RFC 7623: Provider Backbone Bridging Combined with
Ethernet VPN (PBB-EVPN)";
}
identity mpls-evpn {
base service-type;
description
"MPLS-based EVPN service.";
reference
"RFC 7432: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN";
}
identity vxlan-evpn {
base service-type;
description
"VXLAN-based EVPN service.";
reference
"RFC 8365: A Network Virtualization Overlay Solution Using
Ethernet VPN (EVPN)";
}
/*
* Identities related to VPN signaling types
*/
identity vpn-signaling-type {
description
"Base identity for VPN signaling types.";
}
identity bgp-signaling {
base vpn-signaling-type;
description
"Layer 2 VPNs using BGP signaling.";
reference
"RFC 6624: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for
Auto-Discovery and Signaling
RFC 7432: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN";
}
identity ldp-signaling {
base vpn-signaling-type;
description
"Targeted Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) signaling.";
reference
"RFC 5036: LDP Specification";
}
identity l2tp-signaling {
base vpn-signaling-type;
description
"Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) signaling.";
reference
"RFC 3931: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)";
}
/*
* Identities related to routing protocols
*/
identity routing-protocol-type {
description
"Base identity for routing protocol types.";
}
identity static-routing {
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"Static routing protocol.";
}
identity bgp-routing {
if-feature "rtg-bgp";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"BGP routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
}
identity ospf-routing {
if-feature "rtg-ospf";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"OSPF routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol
for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge
(PE-CE) Routing Protocol";
}
identity rip-routing {
if-feature "rtg-rip";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"RIP routing protocol.";
reference
"RFC 2453: RIP Version 2
RFC 2080: RIPng for IPv6";
}
identity isis-routing {
if-feature "rtg-isis";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"IS-IS routing protocol.";
reference
"ISO10589: Information technology - Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems -
Intermediate System to Intermediate System
intra-domain routeing information exchange
protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol
for providing the connectionless-mode network
service (ISO 8473)";
}
identity vrrp-routing {
if-feature "rtg-vrrp";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"VRRP protocol.
This is to be used when LANs are directly connected to
PEs.";
reference
"RFC 5798: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6";
}
identity direct-routing {
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"Direct routing.
This is to be used when LANs are directly connected to PEs
and must be advertised in the VPN.";
}
identity any-routing {
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"Any routing protocol.
For example, this can be used to set policies that apply
to any routing protocol in place.";
}
identity isis-level {
if-feature "rtg-isis";
description
"Base identity for the IS-IS level.";
reference
"ISO10589: Information technology - Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems -
Intermediate System to Intermediate System
intra-domain routeing information exchange
protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol
for providing the connectionless-mode network
service (ISO 8473)";
}
identity level-1 {
base isis-level;
description
"IS-IS Level 1.";
}
identity level-2 {
base isis-level;
description
"IS-IS Level 2.";
}
identity level-1-2 {
base isis-level;
description
"IS-IS Levels 1 and 2.";
}
identity bfd-session-type {
if-feature "bfd";
description
"Base identity for the BFD session type.";
}
identity classic-bfd {
base bfd-session-type;
description
"Classic BFD.";
reference
"RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)";
}
identity s-bfd {
base bfd-session-type;
description
"Seamless BFD.";
reference
"RFC 7880: Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(S-BFD)";
}
/*
* Identities related to route import and export policies
*/
identity ie-type {
description
"Base identity for import/export routing profiles.
These profiles can be reused between VPN nodes.";
}
identity import {
base ie-type;
description
"Import routing profile.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 4.3.1";
}
identity export {
base ie-type;
description
"Export routing profile.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 4.3.1";
}
identity import-export {
base ie-type;
description
"Import/export routing profile.";
}
/*
* Identities related to bandwidth and QoS
*/
identity bw-direction {
description
"Base identity for the bandwidth direction.";
}
identity inbound-bw {
if-feature "inbound-bw";
base bw-direction;
description
"Inbound bandwidth.";
}
identity outbound-bw {
if-feature "outbound-bw";
base bw-direction;
description
"Outbound bandwidth.";
}
identity bw-type {
description
"Base identity for the bandwidth type.";
}
identity bw-per-cos {
if-feature "qos";
base bw-type;
description
"The bandwidth is per CoS.";
}
identity bw-per-port {
base bw-type;
description
"The bandwidth is per a given site network access.";
}
identity bw-per-site {
base bw-type;
description
"The bandwidth is per site. It is applicable to all the
site network accesses within a site.";
}
identity bw-per-service {
base bw-type;
description
"The bandwidth is per VPN service.";
}
identity qos-profile-direction {
if-feature "qos";
description
"Base identity for the QoS profile direction.";
}
identity site-to-wan {
base qos-profile-direction;
description
"From the customer site to the provider's network.
This is typically the CE-to-PE direction.";
}
identity wan-to-site {
base qos-profile-direction;
description
"From the provider's network to the customer site.
This is typically the PE-to-CE direction.";
}
identity both {
base qos-profile-direction;
description
"Both the WAN-to-site direction and the site-to-WAN
direction.";
}
/*
* Identities related to underlay transport instances
*/
identity transport-instance-type {
description
"Base identity for underlay transport instance types.";
}
identity virtual-network {
base transport-instance-type;
description
"Virtual network.";
reference
"RFC 8453: Framework for Abstraction and Control of TE
Networks (ACTN)";
}
identity enhanced-vpn {
base transport-instance-type;
description
"Enhanced VPN (VPN+). VPN+ is an approach that is
based on existing VPN and Traffic Engineering (TE)
technologies but adds characteristics that specific
services require over and above classical VPNs.";
reference
"draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-09:
A Framework for Enhanced Virtual Private Network
(VPN+) Services";
}
identity ietf-network-slice {
base transport-instance-type;
description
"IETF network slice. An IETF network slice
is a logical network topology connecting a number of
endpoints using a set of shared or dedicated network
resources that are used to satisfy specific service
objectives.";
reference
"draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-05:
Framework for IETF Network Slices";
}
/*
* Identities related to protocol types. These types are
* typically used to identify the underlay transport.
*/
identity protocol-type {
description
"Base identity for protocol types.";
}
identity ip-in-ip {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on IP in IP.";
reference
"RFC 2003: IP Encapsulation within IP
RFC 2473: Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification";
}
identity ip-in-ipv4 {
base ip-in-ip;
description
"Transport is based on IP over IPv4.";
reference
"RFC 2003: IP Encapsulation within IP";
}
identity ip-in-ipv6 {
base ip-in-ip;
description
"Transport is based on IP over IPv6.";
reference
"RFC 2473: Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification";
}
identity gre {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on Generic Routing Encapsulation
(GRE).";
reference
"RFC 1701: Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
RFC 1702: Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 networks
RFC 7676: IPv6 Support for Generic Routing Encapsulation
(GRE)";
}
identity gre-v4 {
base gre;
description
"Transport is based on GRE over IPv4.";
reference
"RFC 1702: Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4
networks";
}
identity gre-v6 {
base gre;
description
"Transport is based on GRE over IPv6.";
reference
"RFC 7676: IPv6 Support for Generic Routing Encapsulation
(GRE)";
}
identity vxlan-trans {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on VXLANs.";
reference
"RFC 7348: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN):
A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2
Networks over Layer 3 Networks";
}
identity geneve {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on Generic Network Virtualization
Encapsulation (Geneve).";
reference
"RFC 8926: Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization
Encapsulation";
}
identity ldp {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on LDP.";
reference
"RFC 5036: LDP Specification";
}
identity mpls-in-udp {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on MPLS in UDP.";
reference
"RFC 7510: Encapsulating MPLS in UDP";
}
identity sr {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport is based on Segment Routing (SR).";
reference
"RFC 8660: Segment Routing with the MPLS Data Plane
RFC 8663: MPLS Segment Routing over IP
RFC 8754: IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)";
}
identity sr-mpls {
base sr;
description
"Transport is based on SR with the MPLS data plane.";
reference
"RFC 8660: Segment Routing with the MPLS Data Plane";
}
identity srv6 {
base sr;
description
"Transport is based on SR over IPv6.";
reference
"RFC 8754: IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)";
}
identity sr-mpls-over-ip {
base sr;
description
"Transport is based on SR over MPLS over IP.";
reference
"RFC 8663: MPLS Segment Routing over IP";
}
identity rsvp-te {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport setup relies upon RSVP-TE.";
reference
"RFC 3209: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels";
}
identity bgp-lu {
base protocol-type;
description
"Transport setup relies upon BGP-based labeled prefixes.";
reference
"RFC 8277: Using BGP to Bind MPLS Labels to Address Prefixes";
}
identity unknown {
base protocol-type;
description
"Unknown protocol type.";
}
/*
* Identities related to encapsulation types
*/
identity encapsulation-type {
description
"Base identity for encapsulation types.";
}
identity priority-tagged {
base encapsulation-type;
description
"Priority-tagged interface.";
}
identity dot1q {
if-feature "dot1q";
base encapsulation-type;
description
"dot1Q encapsulation.";
}
identity qinq {
if-feature "qinq";
base encapsulation-type;
description
"QinQ encapsulation.";
}
identity qinany {
if-feature "qinany";
base encapsulation-type;
description
"QinAny encapsulation.";
}
identity vxlan {
if-feature "vxlan";
base encapsulation-type;
description
"VXLAN encapsulation.";
}
identity ethernet-type {
base encapsulation-type;
description
"Ethernet encapsulation type.";
}
identity vlan-type {
base encapsulation-type;
description
"VLAN encapsulation type.";
}
identity untagged-int {
base encapsulation-type;
description
"Untagged interface type.";
}
identity tagged-int {
base encapsulation-type;
description
"Tagged interface type.";
}
identity lag-int {
if-feature "lag-interface";
base encapsulation-type;
description
"LAG interface type.";
}
/*
* Identities related to VLAN tags
*/
identity tag-type {
description
"Base identity for VLAN tag types.";
}
identity c-vlan {
base tag-type;
description
"Indicates a Customer VLAN (C-VLAN) tag, normally using
the 0x8100 Ethertype.";
}
identity s-vlan {
base tag-type;
description
"Indicates a Service VLAN (S-VLAN) tag.";
}
identity s-c-vlan {
base tag-type;
description
"Uses both an S-VLAN tag and a C-VLAN tag.";
}
/*
* Identities related to VXLANs
*/
identity vxlan-peer-mode {
if-feature "vxlan";
description
"Base identity for VXLAN peer modes.";
}
identity static-mode {
base vxlan-peer-mode;
description
"VXLAN access in the static mode.";
}
identity bgp-mode {
base vxlan-peer-mode;
description
"VXLAN access by BGP EVPN learning.";
}
/*
* Identities related to multicast
*/
identity multicast-gp-address-mapping {
if-feature "multicast";
description
"Base identity for multicast group mapping types.";
}
identity static-mapping {
base multicast-gp-address-mapping;
description
"Static mapping, i.e., an interface is attached to the
multicast group as a static member.";
}
identity dynamic-mapping {
base multicast-gp-address-mapping;
description
"Dynamic mapping, i.e., an interface is added to the
multicast group as a result of snooping.";
}
identity multicast-tree-type {
if-feature "multicast";
description
"Base identity for multicast tree types.";
}
identity ssm-tree-type {
base multicast-tree-type;
description
"Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) tree type.";
}
identity asm-tree-type {
base multicast-tree-type;
description
"Any-Source Multicast (ASM) tree type.";
}
identity bidir-tree-type {
base multicast-tree-type;
description
"Bidirectional tree type.";
}
identity multicast-rp-discovery-type {
if-feature "multicast";
description
"Base identity for Rendezvous Point (RP) discovery types.";
}
identity auto-rp {
base multicast-rp-discovery-type;
description
"Auto-RP discovery type.";
}
identity static-rp {
base multicast-rp-discovery-type;
description
"Static type.";
}
identity bsr-rp {
base multicast-rp-discovery-type;
description
"Bootstrap Router (BSR) discovery type.";
}
identity group-management-protocol {
if-feature "multicast";
description
"Base identity for multicast group management protocols.";
}
identity igmp-proto {
base group-management-protocol;
description
"IGMP.";
reference
"RFC 1112: Host Extensions for IP Multicasting
RFC 2236: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2
RFC 3376: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3";
}
identity mld-proto {
base group-management-protocol;
description
"MLD.";
reference
"RFC 2710: Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6
RFC 3810: Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2)
for IPv6";
}
identity pim-proto {
if-feature "pim";
base routing-protocol-type;
description
"PIM.";
reference
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)";
}
identity igmp-version {
if-feature "igmp";
description
"Base identity for indicating the IGMP version.";
}
identity igmpv1 {
base igmp-version;
description
"IGMPv1.";
reference
"RFC 1112: Host Extensions for IP Multicasting";
}
identity igmpv2 {
base igmp-version;
description
"IGMPv2.";
reference
"RFC 2236: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2";
}
identity igmpv3 {
base igmp-version;
description
"IGMPv3.";
reference
"RFC 3376: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3";
}
identity mld-version {
if-feature "mld";
description
"Base identity for indicating the MLD version.";
}
identity mldv1 {
base mld-version;
description
"MLDv1.";
reference
"RFC 2710: Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6";
}
identity mldv2 {
base mld-version;
description
"MLDv2.";
reference
"RFC 3810: Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2)
for IPv6";
}
/*
* Identities related to traffic types
*/
identity tf-type {
description
"Base identity for traffic types.";
}
identity multicast-traffic {
base tf-type;
description
"Multicast traffic.";
}
identity broadcast-traffic {
base tf-type;
description
"Broadcast traffic.";
}
identity unknown-unicast-traffic {
base tf-type;
description
"Unknown unicast traffic.";
}
/*
* Identities related to customer applications
*/
identity customer-application {
description
"Base identity for customer applications.";
}
identity web {
base customer-application;
description
"Web applications (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS).";
}
identity mail {
base customer-application;
description
"Mail application.";
}
identity file-transfer {
base customer-application;
description
"File transfer application (e.g., FTP, Secure FTP (SFTP)).";
}
identity database {
base customer-application;
description
"Database application.";
}
identity social {
base customer-application;
description
"Social-network application.";
}
identity games {
base customer-application;
description
"Gaming application.";
}
identity p2p {
base customer-application;
description
"Peer-to-peer application.";
}
identity network-management {
base customer-application;
description
"Management application (e.g., Telnet, syslog, SNMP).";
}
identity voice {
base customer-application;
description
"Voice application.";
}
identity video {
base customer-application;
description
"Video-conference application.";
}
identity embb {
base customer-application;
description
"Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) application.
Note that eMBB applications demand network performance
with a wide variety of such characteristics as data rate,
latency, loss rate, reliability, and many other
parameters.";
}
identity urllc {
base customer-application;
description
"Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications (URLLC)
application. Note that URLLC applications demand
network performance with a wide variety of such
characteristics as latency, reliability, and many other
parameters.";
}
identity mmtc {
base customer-application;
description
"Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC) application.
Note that mMTC applications demand network performance
with a wide variety of such characteristics as data rate,
latency, loss rate, reliability, and many other
parameters.";
}
/*
* Identities related to service bundling
*/
identity bundling-type {
description
"The base identity for the bundling type. It supports a
subset or all Customer Edge VLAN IDs (CE-VLAN IDs)
associated with an L2VPN service.";
}
identity multi-svc-bundling {
base bundling-type;
description
"Multi-service bundling, i.e., multiple CE-VLAN IDs
can be associated with an L2VPN service at a site.";
}
identity one2one-bundling {
base bundling-type;
description
"One-to-one service bundling, i.e., each L2VPN can
be associated with only one CE-VLAN ID at a site.";
}
identity all2one-bundling {
base bundling-type;
description
"All-to-one bundling, i.e., all CE-VLAN IDs are mapped
to one L2VPN service.";
}
/*
* Identities related to Ethernet services
*/
identity control-mode {
description
"Base identity for the type of control mode used with the
Layer 2 Control Protocol (L2CP).";
}
identity peer {
base control-mode;
description
"'peer' mode, i.e., participate in the protocol towards
the CE. Peering is common for the Link Aggregation Control
Protocol (LACP) and the Ethernet Local Management Interface
(E-LMI) and, occasionally, for the Link Layer Discovery
Protocol (LLDP). For VPLSs and VPWSs, the subscriber can
also request that the peer service provider enable
spanning tree.";
}
identity tunnel {
base control-mode;
description
"'tunnel' mode, i.e., pass to the egress or destination
site. For Ethernet Private Lines (EPLs), the expectation
is that L2CP frames are tunneled.";
}
identity discard {
base control-mode;
description
"'Discard' mode, i.e., discard the frame.";
}
identity neg-mode {
description
"Base identity for the type of negotiation mode.";
}
identity full-duplex {
base neg-mode;
description
"Full-duplex negotiation mode.";
}
identity auto-neg {
base neg-mode;
description
"Auto-negotiation mode.";
}
/******** VPN-related type ********/
typedef vpn-id {
type string;
description
"Defines an identifier that is used with a VPN module.
For example, this can be a service identifier, a node
identifier, etc.";
}
/******* VPN-related reusable groupings *******/
grouping vpn-description {
description
"Provides common VPN information.";
leaf vpn-id {
type vpn-common:vpn-id;
description
"A VPN identifier that uniquely identifies a VPN.
This identifier has a local meaning, e.g., within
a service provider network.";
}
leaf vpn-name {
type string;
description
"Used to associate a name with the service
in order to facilitate the identification of
the service.";
}
leaf vpn-description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of a VPN.";
}
leaf customer-name {
type string;
description
"Name of the customer that actually uses the VPN.";
}
}
grouping vpn-profile-cfg {
description
"Grouping for VPN profile configuration.";
container valid-provider-identifiers {
description
"Container for valid provider profile identifiers.";
list external-connectivity-identifier {
if-feature "external-connectivity";
key "id";
description
"List of profile identifiers that uniquely identify
profiles governing how external connectivity is
provided to a VPN. A profile indicates the type of
external connectivity (Internet, cloud, etc.), the
sites/nodes that are associated with a connectivity
profile, etc. A profile can also indicate filtering
rules and/or address translation rules. Such features
may involve PE, P, or dedicated nodes as a function
of the deployment.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of an external connectivity profile.
The profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
list encryption-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of encryption profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the encryption profile to be used.
The profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
list qos-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of QoS profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the QoS profile to be used. The
profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
list bfd-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of BFD profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the BFD profile to be used. The
profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
list forwarding-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of forwarding profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the forwarding profile to be used.
The profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
list routing-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of routing profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the routing profile to be used by
the routing protocols within sites, VPN network
accesses, or VPN nodes for referring to VRF's
import/export policies.
The profile only has significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
}
}
nacm:default-deny-write;
}
}
grouping oper-status-timestamp {
description
"This grouping defines some operational parameters for the
service.";
leaf status {
type identityref {
base operational-status;
}
config false;
description
"Operational status.";
}
leaf last-change {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the actual date and time of the service status
change.";
}
}
grouping service-status {
description
"Service status grouping.";
container status {
description
"Service status.";
container admin-status {
description
"Administrative service status.";
leaf status {
type identityref {
base administrative-status;
}
description
"Administrative service status.";
}
leaf last-change {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Indicates the actual date and time of the service
status change.";
}
}
container oper-status {
config false;
description
"Operational service status.";
uses oper-status-timestamp;
}
}
}
grouping underlay-transport {
description
"This grouping defines the type of underlay transport for
the VPN service or how that underlay is set. It can
include an identifier for an abstract transport instance to
which the VPN is grafted or indicate a technical
implementation that is expressed as an ordered list of
protocols.";
choice type {
description
"A choice based on the type of underlay transport
constraints.";
case abstract {
description
"Indicates that the transport constraint is an abstract
concept.";
leaf transport-instance-id {
type string;
description
"An optional identifier of the abstract transport
instance.";
}
leaf instance-type {
type identityref {
base transport-instance-type;
}
description
"Indicates a transport instance type. For example,
it can be a VPN+, an IETF network slice, a virtual
network, etc.";
}
}
case protocol {
description
"Indicates a list of protocols.";
leaf-list protocol {
type identityref {
base protocol-type;
}
ordered-by user;
description
"A client-ordered list of transport protocols.";
}
}
}
}
grouping vpn-route-targets {
description
"A grouping that specifies Route Target (RT) import/export
rules used in a BGP-enabled VPN.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
RFC 4664: Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
(L2VPNs)";
list vpn-target {
key "id";
description
"RTs. AND/OR operations may be defined based on the
assigned RTs.";
leaf id {
type uint8;
description
"Identifies each VPN target.";
}
list route-targets {
key "route-target";
description
"List of RTs.";
leaf route-target {
type rt-types:route-target;
description
"Conveys an RT value.";
}
}
leaf route-target-type {
type rt-types:route-target-type;
mandatory true;
description
"Import/export type of the RT.";
}
}
container vpn-policies {
description
"VPN service policies. 'vpn-policies' contains references
to the import and export policies to be associated with
the VPN service.";
leaf import-policy {
type string;
description
"Identifies the import policy.";
}
leaf export-policy {
type string;
description
"Identifies the export policy.";
}
}
}
grouping route-distinguisher {
description
"Grouping for Route Distinguishers (RDs).";
choice rd-choice {
description
"RD choice between several options for providing the RD
value.";
case directly-assigned {
description
"Explicitly assigns an RD value.";
leaf rd {
type rt-types:route-distinguisher;
description
"Indicates an RD value that is explicitly assigned.";
}
}
case directly-assigned-suffix {
description
"The value of the Assigned Number subfield of the RD.
The Administrator subfield of the RD will be
based on other configuration information such as the
Router ID or Autonomous System Number (ASN).";
leaf rd-suffix {
type uint16;
description
"Indicates the value of the Assigned Number
subfield that is explicitly assigned.";
}
}
case auto-assigned {
description
"The RD is auto-assigned.";
container rd-auto {
description
"The RD is auto-assigned.";
choice auto-mode {
description
"Indicates the auto-assignment mode. The RD can be
automatically assigned with or without
indicating a pool from which the RD should be
taken.
For both cases, the server will auto-assign an RD
value 'auto-assigned-rd' and use that value
operationally.";
case from-pool {
leaf rd-pool-name {
type string;
description
"The auto-assignment will be made from the pool
identified by 'rd-pool-name'.";
}
}
case full-auto {
leaf auto {
type empty;
description
"Indicates that an RD is fully auto-assigned.";
}
}
}
leaf auto-assigned-rd {
type rt-types:route-distinguisher;
config false;
description
"The value of the auto-assigned RD.";
}
}
}
case auto-assigned-suffix {
description
"The value of the Assigned Number subfield will be
auto-assigned. The Administrator subfield will be
based on other configuration information such as the
Router ID or ASN.";
container rd-auto-suffix {
description
"The Assigned Number subfield is auto-assigned.";
choice auto-mode {
description
"Indicates the auto-assignment mode of the
Assigned Number subfield. This number can be
automatically assigned with or without indicating a
pool from which the value should be taken.
For both cases, the server will auto-assign
'auto-assigned-rd-suffix' and use that value to
build the RD that will be used operationally.";
case from-pool {
leaf rd-pool-name {
type string;
description
"The assignment will be made from the pool
identified by 'rd-pool-name'.";
}
}
case full-auto {
leaf auto {
type empty;
description
"Indicates that the Assigned Number subfield is
fully auto-assigned.";
}
}
}
leaf auto-assigned-rd-suffix {
type uint16;
config false;
description
"Includes the value of the Assigned Number subfield
that is auto-assigned.";
}
}
}
case no-rd {
description
"Uses the 'empty' type to indicate that the RD has no
value and is not to be auto-assigned.";
leaf no-rd {
type empty;
description
"No RD is assigned.";
}
}
}
}
grouping vpn-components-group {
description
"Grouping definition to assign group IDs to associate
VPN nodes, sites, or network accesses.";
container groups {
description
"Lists the groups to which a VPN node, a site, or a
network access belongs.";
list group {
key "group-id";
description
"List of group IDs.";
leaf group-id {
type string;
description
"The group ID to which a VPN node, a site, or a
network access belongs.";
}
}
}
}
grouping placement-constraints {
description
"Constraints related to placement of a network access.";
list constraint {
key "constraint-type";
description
"List of constraints.";
leaf constraint-type {
type identityref {
base placement-diversity;
}
description
"Diversity constraint type.";
}
container target {
description
"The constraint will apply against this list of
groups.";
choice target-flavor {
description
"Choice for the group definition.";
case id {
list group {
key "group-id";
description
"List of groups.";
leaf group-id {
type string;
description
"The constraint will apply against this
particular group ID.";
}
}
}
case all-accesses {
leaf all-other-accesses {
type empty;
description
"The constraint will apply against all other
network accesses of a site.";
}
}
case all-groups {
leaf all-other-groups {
type empty;
description
"The constraint will apply against all other
groups managed by the customer.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping ports {
description
"Choice of specifying source or destination port numbers.";
choice source-port {
description
"Choice of specifying the source port or referring to a
group of source port numbers.";
container source-port-range-or-operator {
description
"Source port definition.";
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
}
}
choice destination-port {
description
"Choice of specifying a destination port or referring to a
group of destination port numbers.";
container destination-port-range-or-operator {
description
"Destination port definition.";
uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator;
}
}
}
grouping qos-classification-policy {
description
"Configuration of the traffic classification policy.";
list rule {
key "id";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of marking rules.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"An identifier of the QoS classification policy rule.";
}
choice match-type {
default "match-flow";
description
"Choice for classification.";
case match-flow {
choice l3 {
description
"Either IPv4 or IPv6.";
container ipv4 {
description
"Rule set that matches the IPv4 header.";
uses packet-fields:acl-ip-header-fields;
uses packet-fields:acl-ipv4-header-fields;
}
container ipv6 {
description
"Rule set that matches the IPv6 header.";
uses packet-fields:acl-ip-header-fields;
uses packet-fields:acl-ipv6-header-fields;
}
}
choice l4 {
description
"Includes Layer-4-specific information.
This version focuses on TCP and UDP.";
container tcp {
description
"Rule set that matches the TCP header.";
uses packet-fields:acl-tcp-header-fields;
uses ports;
}
container udp {
description
"Rule set that matches the UDP header.";
uses packet-fields:acl-udp-header-fields;
uses ports;
}
}
}
case match-application {
leaf match-application {
type identityref {
base customer-application;
}
description
"Defines the application to match.";
}
}
}
leaf target-class-id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the class of service. This
identifier is internal to the administration.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446].
このドキュメントで指定されているYANGモジュールは、NetConf [RFC6241]またはRESTCONF [RFC8040]などのネットワーク管理プロトコルを介してアクセスするように設計されているデータのスキーマを定義しています。最低のNETCONFレイヤーはセキュアトランスポート層であり、必須のセキュアトランスポートはSecure Shell（SSH）[RFC6242]です。最低のRETCONFレイヤーはhttpsで、必須のセキュアトランスポートはTLS [RFC8446]です。
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
ネットワーク構成アクセス制御モデル（NACM）[RFC8341]は、特定のNETCONFまたはRESTCONFユーザへのアクセスを利用可能なすべてのNetConfまたはRESTCONFプロトコル操作およびコンテンツの事前設定されたサブセットに制限する手段を提供します。
The "ietf-vpn-common" module defines a set of identities, types, and groupings. These nodes are intended to be reused by other YANG modules. The module by itself does not expose any data nodes that are writable, data nodes that contain read-only state, or RPCs. As such, there are no additional security issues related to the "ietf-vpn-common" module that need to be considered.
「IETF-VPN-Common」モジュールは、一連のID、型、およびグループ化を定義します。これらのノードは他のYangモジュールによって再利用されることを意図しています。モジュールによるモジュールは、書き込み可能なデータノード、読み取り専用状態を含むデータノード、またはRPCSを公開しません。そのため、考慮する必要がある「IETF-VPN-Common」モジュールに関連する追加のセキュリティ問題はありません。
Modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document should identify the corresponding security considerations. For example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related information (e.g., 'customer-name'). Disclosing such information may be considered a violation of the customer-provider trust relationship.
この文書で定義されているグループ化を使用するモジュールは、対応するセキュリティ上の考慮事項を識別する必要があります。たとえば、これらのグループのいくつかを再利用すると、プライバシー関連の情報（例えば、「顧客名」）が表示されます。そのような情報を開示することは、顧客プロバイダ信頼関係の違反と見なされ得る。
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
IANAは、「IETF XML Registry」では、次のURIを「IETF XML Registry」で登録しました[RFC3688]：
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vpn-common Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
URI：URN：IETF：PARAMS：XML：NS：YANG：IETF - VPN共通登録者連絡先：IESG。XML：n / a;要求されたURIはXMLネームスペースです。
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry.
IANAは、「Yang Parameters」レジストリ内に、次のYangモジュールを「Yang Module Names」サブレジスト[RFC6020]に登録しました。
Name: ietf-vpn-common
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vpn-common
Maintained by IANA? N
Prefix: vpn-common
Reference: RFC 9181
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC3688] Mealling、M.、 "IETF XML Registry"、BCP 81、RFC 3688、DOI 10.17487 / RFC3688、2004年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>。
[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364>.
[RFC4364] Rosen、E.およびY.Rekhter、「BGP / MPLS IP仮想プライベートネットワーク（VPNS）」、RFC 4364、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4364、2006年2月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/ RFC4364>。
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund、M.、Ed。、 "Yang - ネットワーク構成プロトコルのデータモデリング言語（NetConf）"、RFC 6020、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6020、2010年10月、<https：//www.rfc-編集者。org / info / rfc6020>。
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6241] ENNS、R.、ED。、Bjorklund、M.、Ed。、Schoenwaelder、J.、Ed。、およびA. Bierman、ED。、「ネットワーク構成プロトコル（NetConf）」、RFC 6241、DOI 10.17487 /RFC6241、2011年6月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>。
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman、M.、「Secure Shell（SSH）を介したNetConfプロトコルの使用」、RFC 6242、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6242、2011年6月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>。
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder、J.、Ed。、「共通ヤンデータ型」、RFC 6991、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6991、2013年7月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>。
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund、M.、Ed。、「Yang 1.1データモデリング言語」、RFC 7950、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7950、2016年8月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>。
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8040] Bierman、A.、Bjorklund、M.、K。Watsen、RESTCONFプロトコル、RFC 8040、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8040、2017年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>。
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger, "Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294, DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8294] Liu、X.、Qu、Y、Y、Lindem、A.、Hopps、C.、およびL. Berger、「ルーティングエリアの一般的なヤン・データ・タイプ」、RFC 8294、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8294、2017年12月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>。
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8341] Bierman、A.およびM.Bjorklund、「ネットワーク構成アクセス制御モデル」、STD 91、RFC 8341、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8341、2018年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>。
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8446] RESCORLA、E。、「トランスポート層セキュリティ（TLS）プロトコルバージョン1.3」、RFC 8446、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8446、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>。
[RFC8519] Jethanandani, M., Agarwal, S., Huang, L., and D. Blair, "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)", RFC 8519, DOI 10.17487/RFC8519, March 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8519>.
[RFC8519] Jethanandani、M.、Agarwal、S.、Huang、L.、D.Bleair、「ネットワークアクセス制御リストのためのYangデータモデル（ACLS）」、RFC 8519、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8519、2019年3月、<HTTPS//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8519>。
[ACTN-VN-YANG] Lee, Y., Ed., Dhody, D., Ed., Ceccarelli, D., Bryskin, I., and B. Yoon, "A YANG Data Model for VN Operation", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-13, 23 October 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-13>.
[Actn-Vn-Yang] Lee、Y.、Ed。、Dhody、D.、Ed。、Ceccarelli、D.、Bryskin、I.、B. Yoon、「VN操作のヤンデータモデル」進捗状況、インターネットドラフト、ドラフト-IETF-TEAS-ACTN-VN-YANG-13,2021、<https：//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ romft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-13>。
[Enhanced-VPN-Framework] Dong, J., Bryant, S., Li, Z., Miyasaka, T., and Y. Lee, "A Framework for Enhanced Virtual Private Network (VPN+) Services", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-09, 25 October 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-09>.
[Enhanced-VPNフレームワーク] Dong、J.、Bryant、S.、Li、Z.、Miyasaka、T.、Y。Lee、「強化された仮想プライベートネットワーク（VPN）サービスのためのフレームワーク」、進行中の作業、インターネットドラフト、ドラフト - IETF-TEAS-Enhanced-VPN-09,25、<https：//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-09>。
[IEEE802.1ad]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area
Networks---Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks---Amendment
4: Provider Bridges",
<https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802_1ad-2005.html>.
[IEEE802.1AX] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Link Aggregation", <https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802_1AX-2020.html>.
[IEEE802.1AX] IEEE、「LOCALおよびMetropolitan Area Networks - Link AggregationのIEEE規格」、<https：//tandards.ieee.org/standard/802_1ax-2020.html>。
[IEEE802.1Q] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Bridges and Bridged Networks", <https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802_1Q-2018.html>.
[IEEE802.1Q] IEEE、「ローカルとメトロポリタンエリアネットワークのIEEE規格 - ブリッジとブリッジネットワーク」、<https：//standards.ieee.org/standard/802_1q-2018.html>。
[ISO10589] ISO, "Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Intermediate System to Intermediate System intra-domain routeing information exchange protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol for providing the connectionless-mode network service (ISO 8473)", International Standard 10589:2002, Second Edition, November 2002, <https://www.iso.org/standard/30932.html>.
[ISO10589] ISO、情報技術 - システム間の電気通信と情報交換中間システムへの中間システムへの情報交換コネクションレスモードネットワークサービス（ISO 8473）のプロトコルと組み合わせて使用するための交換プロトコルStandard 10589：2002、2002年11月、2002年11月、<https：//www.iso.org/standard/30932.html>。
[L2NM-YANG] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., and L. Munoz, "A Layer 2 VPN Network YANG Model", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-12, 22 November 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-12>.
[L2NM-YANG] Barguil、S.、Gonzalez De Deos、O.、Ed。、Boucadair、M.、Ed。、およびL. Munoz、「レイヤ2 VPNネットワークヤンモデル」、進行中の作業、インターネットドラフト、draft-ietf-opsawgg-l2nm-12,221月22日、<https：//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-12>。
[Network-Slices-Framework] Farrel, A., Ed., Gray, E., Drake, J., Rokui, R., Homma, S., Makhijani, K., Contreras, LM., and J. Tantsura, "Framework for IETF Network Slices", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-05, 25 October 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-05>.
[ネットワークスライスフレームワーク] Farrel、A.、ED。、灰色、E.、Drake、J.、Rokui、R.、Homma、S.、Makhijani、K.、Contreras、LM、J.Tantsura、「IETFネットワークスライスのフレームワーク」、進行中の作業、インターネットドラフト、ドラフト-IETF-TEAS-IETF-Network-Slices-05,25,25、<https：//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/草案-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-05>。
[RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.
[RFC0791] Postel、J.、「インターネットプロトコル」、STD 5、RFC 791、DOI 10.17487 / RFC0791、1981年9月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>。
[RFC1112] Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5, RFC 1112, DOI 10.17487/RFC1112, August 1989, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1112>.
[RFC1112]「IPマルチキャスト用のホスト拡張」、STD 5、RFC 1112、DOI 10.17487 / RFC1112、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1112>。
[RFC1701] Hanks, S., Li, T., Farinacci, D., and P. Traina, "Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)", RFC 1701, DOI 10.17487/RFC1701, October 1994, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1701>.
[RFC1701]ハンクス、S.、Li、T.、Farinacci、D.、およびP. Traina、「ジェネリックルーティングカプセル化（GRE）」、RFC 1701、DOI 10.17487 / RFC1701、1994年10月、<https：// www。rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1701>。
[RFC1702] Hanks, S., Li, T., Farinacci, D., and P. Traina, "Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 networks", RFC 1702, DOI 10.17487/RFC1702, October 1994, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1702>.
[RFC1702]ハンクス、S.、Li、T.、Farinacci、D.、およびP. Traina、「IPv4ネットワーク上の一般的なルーティングカプセル化」、RFC 1702、DOI 10.17487 / RFC1702、1994年10月、<https：// www。rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1702>。
[RFC2003] Perkins, C., "IP Encapsulation within IP", RFC 2003, DOI 10.17487/RFC2003, October 1996, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2003>.
[RFC2003] PERKINS、C、「IP内のIPカプセル化」、RFC 2003、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2003、1996年10月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2003>。
[RFC2080] Malkin, G. and R. Minnear, "RIPng for IPv6", RFC 2080, DOI 10.17487/RFC2080, January 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2080>.
[RFC2080] Malkin、G.およびR. Minnear、RFC 2080、RFC 2080、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2080、1997年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2080>。
[RFC2236] Fenner, W., "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2", RFC 2236, DOI 10.17487/RFC2236, November 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2236>.
[RFC2236] Fenner、W。、「インターネットグループ管理プロトコル、バージョン2」、RFC 2236、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2236、1997年11月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2236>。
[RFC2453] Malkin, G., "RIP Version 2", STD 56, RFC 2453, DOI 10.17487/RFC2453, November 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2453>.
[RFC2453] Malkin、G.、「RIPバージョン2」、STD 56、RFC 2453、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2453、1998年11月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2453>。
[RFC2473] Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification", RFC 2473, DOI 10.17487/RFC2473, December 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2473>.
[RFC2473] Conta、A.およびS.THERER、「IPv6仕様の一般的なパケットトンネリング」、RFC 2473、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2473、1998年12月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2473>。
[RFC2710] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, DOI 10.17487/RFC2710, October 1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2710>.
[RFC2710] Theering、S.、Fenner、W。、およびB.Baberman、「IPv6のマルチキャストリスナー発見（MLD）」、RFC 2710、DOI 10.17487 / RFC2710、1999年10月、<https：///www.rfc-編集者.org / info / rfc2710>。
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V., and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>.
[RFC3209] awduche、D.、Berger、L.、GaN、D.、Li、T.、Srinivasan、V.、G.Svp-Te：LSPトンネルのRSVPへの拡張機能、RFC 3209、DOI10.17487 / RFC3209、2001年12月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>。
[RFC3376] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A. Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3", RFC 3376, DOI 10.17487/RFC3376, October 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376>.
[RFC3376] Cain、B.、Theering、S.、Kouvelas、I.、Fenner、B.、およびA.Thyagarajan、「インターネットグループ管理プロトコル、バージョン3」、RFC 3376、DOI 10.17487 / RFC3376、2002年10月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376>。
[RFC3810] Vida, R., Ed. and L. Costa, Ed., "Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, DOI 10.17487/RFC3810, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3810>.
[RFC3810] VIDA、R.、ED。そして、「Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2（MLDV6」、RFC 3810、DOI 10.17487 / RFC3810、2004年6月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3810>。
[RFC3931] Lau, J., Ed., Townsley, M., Ed., and I. Goyret, Ed., "Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)", RFC 3931, DOI 10.17487/RFC3931, March 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3931>.
[RFC3931] Lau、J.、Ed。、Townsley、M.、Ed。、そしてI。Gooyret、Ed。、「レイヤ2トンネリングプロトコル - バージョン3（L2TPv3）」、RFC 3931、DOI 10.17487 / RFC3931、2005年3月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3931>。
[RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026, DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4026>.
[RFC4026] Andersson、L.およびT. Madsen、「プロバイダー・プロビジョニング仮想プライベート・ネットワーク（VPN）用語」、RFC 4026、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4026、2005年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC4026>。
[RFC4176] El Mghazli, Y., Ed., Nadeau, T., Boucadair, M., Chan, K., and A. Gonguet, "Framework for Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks (L3VPN) Operations and Management", RFC 4176, DOI 10.17487/RFC4176, October 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4176>.
[RFC4176] El Mghazli、Y、Ed。、Nadeau、T.、Boucadair、M.、Chan、K.、およびA. Gonguet、「レイヤ3仮想プライベートネットワーク（L3VPN）操作および管理のためのフレームワーク」、RFC 4176、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4176、2005年10月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4176>。
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC4271]、y、ed。、Li、T.、Ed。、S.Hares、Ed。、「ボーダーゲートウェイプロトコル4（BGP-4）」、RFC 4271、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4271、2006年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>。
[RFC4577] Rosen, E., Psenak, P., and P. Pillay-Esnault, "OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4577, DOI 10.17487/RFC4577, June 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4577>.
[RFC4577] Rosen、E.、Psenak、P.、P. Pillay-Esnault、「BGP / MPLS IP仮想プライベートネットワーク（VPNS / MPLS IP仮想プライベートネットワーク（VPNS）」、RFC 4577、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4577、2006年6月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4577>。
[RFC4664] Andersson, L., Ed. and E. Rosen, Ed., "Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs)", RFC 4664, DOI 10.17487/RFC4664, September 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4664>.
[RFC4664]アンダーソン、L.、ED。E. Rosen、Ed。、「レイヤ2仮想プライベートネットワーク（L2VPNS）のフレームワーク（L2VPNS）」、RFC 4664、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4664、2006年9月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4664>。
[RFC4761] Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling", RFC 4761, DOI 10.17487/RFC4761, January 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4761>.
[RFC4761] Kompella、K.、ED。そして、rekhter、ed。、「自動検出およびシグナリングのためのBGPを使用した仮想プライベートLANサービス（VPLS）」、RFC 4761、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4761、2007年1月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/情報/ RFC4761>。
[RFC4762] Lasserre, M., Ed. and V. Kompella, Ed., "Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Signaling", RFC 4762, DOI 10.17487/RFC4762, January 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4762>.
[RFC4762] Lasserre、M.、ED。V. K. Kompella、ed。、「ラベル配布プロトコル（LDP）シグナリング（LDP）シグナリング（LDP）シグナリング（LDP）シグナリング（LDP）シグナリング（VPLS）、RFC 4762、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4762、2007年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/情報/ RFC4762>。
[RFC4960] Stewart, R., Ed., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, DOI 10.17487/RFC4960, September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4960>.
[RFC4960] Stewart、R.、Ed。、「ストリーム制御伝送プロトコル」、RFC 4960、DOI 10.17487 / RFC4960、2007年9月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4960>。
[RFC5036] Andersson, L., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., and B. Thomas, Ed., "LDP Specification", RFC 5036, DOI 10.17487/RFC5036, October 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5036>.
[RFC5036] Andersson、L.、Ed。、Minei、I。、およびB. Thomas、Ed。、「LDP仕様」、RFC 5036、DOI 10.17487 / RFC5036、2007年10月、<https：// www。rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5036>。
[RFC5798] Nadas, S., Ed., "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6", RFC 5798, DOI 10.17487/RFC5798, March 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5798>.
[RFC5798] NADAS、S、ED。、「IPv4およびIPv6のための仮想ルータ冗長プロトコル（VRRP）バージョン3」、RFC 5798、DOI 10.17487 / RFC5798、2010年3月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/ info / rfc5798>。
[RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.
[RFC5880] Katz、D.およびD.ワード、「双方向転送検出（BFD）」、RFC 5880、DOI 10.17487 / RFC5880、2010年6月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>。
[RFC6513] Rosen, E., Ed. and R. Aggarwal, Ed., "Multicast in MPLS/ BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6513, DOI 10.17487/RFC6513, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>.
[RFC6513]ロージェン、E。、ED。R.Aggarwal、ed。、「MPLS / BGP IP VPNSのマルチキャスト」、RFC 6513、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6513、2012年2月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>。
[RFC6565] Pillay-Esnault, P., Moyer, P., Doyle, J., Ertekin, E., and M. Lundberg, "OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge (PE-CE) Routing Protocol", RFC 6565, DOI 10.17487/RFC6565, June 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6565>.
[RFC6565] Pillay-Esnault、P.、Moyer、P.、Doyle、J.、Etekin、E.、およびM.Lundberg、 "Customer EdgeへのプロバイダエッジとしてのOSPFv3（PE-CE）ルーティングプロトコル"、RFC 6565、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6565、2012年6月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6565>。
[RFC6624] Kompella, K., Kothari, B., and R. Cherukuri, "Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling", RFC 6624, DOI 10.17487/RFC6624, May 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6624>.
[RFC6624] Kompella、K.、Kothari、B.およびR.Cherukuri、「自動発見およびシグナリング用のBGPを使用したレイヤ2仮想プライベートネットワーク」、RFC 6624、DOI 10.17487 / RFC6624、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6624>。
[RFC7348] Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger, L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks", RFC 7348, DOI 10.17487/RFC7348, August 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7348>.
[RFC7348] Mahalingam、M.、Dutt、D.、Duda、K.、Agarwal、P.、Kreeger、L.、Sridhar、T.、Bursell、M.、およびC.Wright、「仮想拡張ローカルエリアネットワーク（VXLAN）：Layer 3ネットワーク上の仮想化レイヤ2ネットワークを重ねるためのフレームワーク「RFC 7348、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7348、2014年8月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7348>。
[RFC7432] Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A., Uttaro, J., Drake, J., and W. Henderickx, "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN", RFC 7432, DOI 10.17487/RFC7432, February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7432>.
[RFC7432] Sajassi、A.、ED。、Aggarwal、R.、Bitar、N.、Isaac、A.、Uttaro、J.、Drake、J.、およびW.HenderickX、「BGP MPLSベースのイーサネットVPN」、RFC 7432、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7432、2015年2月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7432>。
[RFC7510] Xu, X., Sheth, N., Yong, L., Callon, R., and D. Black, "Encapsulating MPLS in UDP", RFC 7510, DOI 10.17487/RFC7510, April 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7510>.
[RFC7510] XU、X.、Sheth、N.、Yong、L.、Callon、R.、およびD.黒、「UDPのカプセル化MPLS」、RFC 7510、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7510、2015年4月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7510>。
[RFC7623] Sajassi, A., Ed., Salam, S., Bitar, N., Isaac, A., and W. Henderickx, "Provider Backbone Bridging Combined with Ethernet VPN (PBB-EVPN)", RFC 7623, DOI 10.17487/RFC7623, September 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7623>.
[RFC7623] Sajassi、A.、ED。、SALAM、S、BITAR、N.、ISAAC、A.、およびW.HenderickX、「イーサネットVPN（PBB-EVPN）と組み合わせたプロバイダバックボーンブリッジング（PBB-EVPN）」、RFC 7623、DOI10.17487 / RFC7623、2015年9月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7623>。
[RFC7676] Pignataro, C., Bonica, R., and S. Krishnan, "IPv6 Support for Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)", RFC 7676, DOI 10.17487/RFC7676, October 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7676>.
[RFC7676] Pignataro、C、Bonica、R.およびS.Krishnan、「一般的なルーティングカプセル化のためのIPv6サポート（GRE）」、RFC 7676、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7676、2015年10月、<https：///www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7676>。
[RFC7761] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., Kouvelas, I., Parekh, R., Zhang, Z., and L. Zheng, "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)", STD 83, RFC 7761, DOI 10.17487/RFC7761, March 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>.
[RFC7761] Fenner、B、Handley、M.、Holbrook、H.、Kouvelas、I。、Parekh、R.、Zhang、Z.、L.Zheng、 "プロトコル独立マルチキャスト - スパースモード（PIM-SM）：プロトコル仕様（改訂） "、STD 83、RFC 7761、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7761、2016年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>。
[RFC7880] Pignataro, C., Ward, D., Akiya, N., Bhatia, M., and S. Pallagatti, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)", RFC 7880, DOI 10.17487/RFC7880, July 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7880>.
[RFC7880] Pignataro、C、Ward、D.、Akiya、N.、Bhatia、M.、S. Pallagatti、「シームレス双方向転送検出（S-BFD）」、RFC 7880、DOI 10.17487 / RFC7880、2016年7月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7880>。
[RFC8200] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200, DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200>.
[RFC8200] The's、S.およびR.hinden、「インターネットプロトコル、バージョン6（IPv6）仕様」、STD 86、RFC 8200、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8200、2017年7月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/ info / rfc8200>。
[RFC8214] Boutros, S., Sajassi, A., Salam, S., Drake, J., and J. Rabadan, "Virtual Private Wire Service Support in Ethernet VPN", RFC 8214, DOI 10.17487/RFC8214, August 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8214>.
[RFC8214] Boutros、S.、Sajassi、A.、Salam、S.、Drake、J.、J. Rabadan、「イーサネットVPNでのバーチャルプライベートワイヤサービスサポート」、RFC 8214、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8214、2017年8月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8214>。
[RFC8277] Rosen, E., "Using BGP to Bind MPLS Labels to Address Prefixes", RFC 8277, DOI 10.17487/RFC8277, October 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8277>.
[RFC8277] Rosen、E.、「MPLSラベルをアドレスプレフィックスに接続するためのBGPの使用」、RFC 8277、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8277、2017年10月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8277>。
[RFC8299] Wu, Q., Ed., Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8299, DOI 10.17487/RFC8299, January 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8299>.
[RFC8299] WU、Q、ED。、Litkowski、S.、Tomotaki、L.、およびK.小垣、「L3VPNサービス提供のYangデータモデル」、RFC 8299、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8299、2018年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8299>。
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund、M.およびL. Berger、Ed。、「Yang Tree Diagress」、BCP 215、RFC 8340、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8340、2018年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC8340>。
[RFC8365] Sajassi, A., Ed., Drake, J., Ed., Bitar, N., Shekhar, R., Uttaro, J., and W. Henderickx, "A Network Virtualization Overlay Solution Using Ethernet VPN (EVPN)", RFC 8365, DOI 10.17487/RFC8365, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8365>.
[RFC8365] Sajassi、A.、ED。、Drake、J.、Ed。、Bitar、N.、Shekhar、R.、Uttaro、J.、およびW.Henderickx、「イーサネットVPNを使用したネットワーク仮想化オーバーレイソリューション（EVPN） "、RFC 8365、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8365、2018年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8365>。
[RFC8453] Ceccarelli, D., Ed. and Y. Lee, Ed., "Framework for Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)", RFC 8453, DOI 10.17487/RFC8453, August 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8453>.
[RFC8453] Ceccarelli、D.、ED。そして、「TEネットワーク（ACTN）の抽象化と管理のためのフレームワーク（ACTN）」、RFC 8453、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8453、2018年8月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8453>。
[RFC8466] Wen, B., Fioccola, G., Ed., Xie, C., and L. Jalil, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery", RFC 8466, DOI 10.17487/RFC8466, October 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8466>.
[RFC8466]ウェン、B.、Fioccola、G.、ED。、XIE、C、およびL。Jalil、「レイヤ2仮想プライベートネットワーク（L2VPN）サービス提供のためのYangデータモデル、RFC 8466、DOI 10.17487 /RFC8466、2018年10月、<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8466>。
[RFC8512] Boucadair, M., Ed., Sivakumar, S., Jacquenet, C., Vinapamula, S., and Q. Wu, "A YANG Module for Network Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)", RFC 8512, DOI 10.17487/RFC8512, January 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8512>.
[RFC8512] Boucadair、M.、Ed。、Sivakumar、S.、Jacquenet、C、Vinapamula、S.、およびQ. WU、「ネットワークアドレス変換用Yangモジュール」（NAT）およびネットワークプレフィックス翻訳（NPT） "、RFC 8512、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8512、2019年1月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8512>。
[RFC8660] Bashandy, A., Ed., Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with the MPLS Data Plane", RFC 8660, DOI 10.17487/RFC8660, December 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8660>.
[RFC8660] Bashandy、A.、ED、Filsfils、C.、Ed。、Presidi、S.、Decraene、B.、Litkowski、S.、およびR. Shakir、「MPLSデータプレーンを使用したセグメントルーティング」、RFC8660、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8660、2019年12月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8660>。
[RFC8663] Xu, X., Bryant, S., Farrel, A., Hassan, S., Henderickx, W., and Z. Li, "MPLS Segment Routing over IP", RFC 8663, DOI 10.17487/RFC8663, December 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8663>.
[RFC8663] XU、X.、Bryant、S.、Farrel、A.、Hassan、S.、Henderickx、W.、およびZ.Li、「MPLSセグメントルーティング」、RFC 8663、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8663、12月2019年、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8663>。
[RFC8754] Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754>.
[RFC8754] Filsfils、C、ED。、Dukes、D.、ED。、PREVIDI、S、Leddy、J.、Matsushima、S.、およびD. Voyer、 "IPv6セグメントルーティングヘッダー（SRH）"、RFC8754、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8754、2020年3月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754>。
[RFC8926] Gross, J., Ed., Ganga, I., Ed., and T. Sridhar, Ed., "Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation", RFC 8926, DOI 10.17487/RFC8926, November 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8926>.
[RFC8926] GROSS、J.、ED。、GANGA、I。、およびT.Sridhar、ED。、「GENEVE：GENERICネットワーク仮想化カプセル化」、RFC 8926、DOI 10.17487 / RFC8926、2020年11月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8926>。
[RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182, February 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9182>.
[RFC9182] Barguil、S.、Gonzalez de Dios、O.、Ed。、Boucadair、M.、Ed。、Munoz、L.、およびA. Aguado、RFC 9182、DOI 10.17487 / RFC9182、2022年2月、<https：//www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9182>。
Appendix A. Example of Common Data Nodes in Early L2NM/L3NM Designs
付録A.初期のL2NM / L3NMデザインにおける一般的なデータノードの例
In order to avoid duplication of data nodes and to ease passing data among layers (i.e., from the service layer to the network layer and vice versa), early versions of the L3NM reused many of the data nodes that are defined in the L3SM. Nevertheless, that approach was abandoned because that design was interpreted as if the deployment of the L3NM depends on the L3SM, while this is not required. For example, a service provider may decide to use the L3NM to build its L3VPN services without exposing the L3SM to customers.
データノードの重複を回避し、層間（サービス層からネットワーク層へ、およびその逆に）データを渡すために、L3NMの初期のバージョンは、L3SMで定義されている多くのデータノードを再利用しました。それにもかかわらず、そのアプローチは、L3NMの展開がL3SMに依存しているかのようにその設計が解釈されたため、そのアプローチは放棄されましたが、これは必要ありません。たとえば、サービスプロバイダは、L3SMを顧客に公開することなく、L3VPNサービスを構築するためにL3NMを使用することを決定することができます。
Likewise, early versions of the L2NM reused many of the data nodes that are defined in both the L2SM and the L3NM. An example of L3NM groupings reused in the L2NM is shown in Figure 5. Such reuse of data nodes was interpreted as if the deployment of the L2NM requires support for the L3NM, which is not required.
同様に、L2NMの初期バージョンは、L2SMとL3NMの両方で定義されているデータノードの多くを再使用しました。L2NMで再使用されたL3NMグループの例を図5に示します。このようなデータノードの再利用は、L2NMの展開がL3NMのサポートを必要とするかのように解釈されています。
module ietf-l2vpn-ntw {
...
import ietf-l3vpn-ntw {
prefix l3vpn-ntw;
reference
"RFC 9182: A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs";
}
...
container l2vpn-ntw {
...
container vpn-services {
list vpn-service {
...
uses l3vpn-ntw:service-status;
uses l3vpn-ntw:svc-transport-encapsulation;
...
}
}
...
}
}
Figure 5: Excerpt from the L2NM YANG Module
図5：L2nm Yangモジュールからの抜粋
Acknowledgements
謝辞
During the discussions of this work, helpful comments and reviews were received from (listed alphabetically) Alejandro Aguado, Raul Arco, Miguel Cros Cecilia, Joe Clarke, Dhruv Dhody, Adrian Farrel, Roque Gagliano, Christian Jacquenet, Kireeti Kompella, Julian Lucek, Tom Petch, Erez Segev, and Paul Sherratt. Many thanks to them.
この作品の議論の間、有用なコメントやレビューは（アルファベット順に上場）Alejandro Aguado、Raul Arco、Miguel Cros Cecilia、Joe Crarke、Dhruv Dhody、Adrian Farrel、Roque Gagliano、Christian Jacquenet、Kireeeti Kompella、Julian Lucek、Tomペッチ、Erez Segev、およびPaul Sherratt。彼らに感謝します。
This work is partially supported by the European Commission under Horizon 2020 Secured autonomic traffic management for a Tera of SDN flows (Teraflow) project (grant agreement number 101015857).
この作業は、SDNフロー（TeraFlow）プロジェクトのTERAのためのHorizo n 2020の担保付きの自律神経交通管理の下での欧州委員会によって部分的に支えられています（助成金合意番号101015857）。
Many thanks to Radek Krejci for the YANG Doctors review, Wesley Eddy for the tsvart review, Ron Bonica and Victoria Pritchard for the RtgDir review, Joel Halpern for the genart review, Tim Wicinski for the opsdir review, and Suresh Krishnan for the intdir review.
Radek Krejciのためのヤン・コクター・レビュー、Tsvart Review、Ron Bonica、Victoria PritchardのためのWesley Eddy RTGDIRレビュー、ジェネルトのレビュー、ティム・ウィッシェキ、ティム・ウィッチェキ、そしてintdirのレビューのためのSuresh Krishnanのためのジョエル・ハルパン。
Special thanks to Robert Wilton for the AD review.
広告レビューのためのRobert Wiltonに感謝します。
Thanks to Roman Danyliw, Lars Eggert, Warren Kumari, Erik Kline, Zaheduzzaman Sarker, Benjamin Kaduk, and Éric Vyncke for the IESG review.
Roman Danyliw、Lars Neghert、Warren Kumari、Erik Kline、Zaheduzzaman Sarker、Benjamin Kaduk、およびIESGレビューのためのéricVynckeに感謝します。
Contributors
貢献者
Italo Busi Huawei Technologies
イタロビジーハワイテクノロジー
Email: Italo.Busi@huawei.com
Luis Angel Munoz Vodafone
ルイスエンジェルヌーズボーダフォン
Email: luis-angel.munoz@vodafone.com
Victor Lopez Nokia Madrid Spain
ビクターロペスノキアマドリードスペイン
Email: victor.lopez@nokia.com
Authors' Addresses
著者の住所
Samier Barguil Telefonica Madrid Spain
Samier Barguil Telefonicaマドリードスペイン
Email: samier.barguilgiraldo.ext@telefonica.com
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios (editor) Telefonica Madrid Spain
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios（編集）テレフォニカマドリードスペイン
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Mohamed Boucadair (editor) Orange France
Mohamed Boucadair（編集）オレンジフランス
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue Yuhua District Nanjing Jiangsu, 210012 China
Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue Yuhua District Nanjing Jiangsu、210012中国
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com